What Is Wrong With You People? Government Healthcare Is A PROVEN Disaster!

I listened submissively as I listened to this elder of mine - this fool - ranting on about the virtues of Government run healthcare to come. He is an avid supporter!

"The government won't do a bad job. They can't look bad - they will make it good for everyone"

"Now our healthcare system will be able to be the envy of the world."

I was out of time and I had to move on. Nonetheless, this was an insight into the way this 'fool that "leads"' had become our 'leader' in the first. These are the keys as I see them:

1. An ignorant mass.

2. A smooth talking PC bs king.

3. A surreal agenda.

4. Promises, promises, promises.

And they lap it up like dogs.

What does it take to be this stupid? Bread AND circuses??

Apparently it doesn't take much. Despite the controversial oppositions of government run healthcare, no one can deny my own insights and experience. Government run healthcare in such diverse, educated, wealthy and sophisticated countries such as Canada, England, Germany etc. are a proven disaster. Logically, the first place we should strive to follow is where the masses die for lack of care. Their only relief valve has ironically been the real envy of world health care - the United States of America. Thats right. For the wealthy, the limitations of poor Government paid doctors, inadequate supply in the face of overwhelmingly abused demand, and the tragedy of failure has always - until soon from now - has(d) been the better option of going to America and having the matter dealt with properly with the best of healthcare in the world.

Now where are the voices of the wealthy that will lose this right? Or will they? Will every Doctor succumb to the failure proven system of government run health? Or will the masses be free to pay with Doctors that do not succumb?

The strings of government have no limits. Doctors that plan to offer both will soon find they cannot. As the demand grows for "Freecare" the government will require of the doctors that they make their government obligations their first priority. Their only option will be to opt out. Don't like it? Drop the government support cold turkey, cut yourself off from all government support, and systems, or toe the line. I GUARANTEE you these will be the only options.

By the way, in the regulated world of government anything, the going maximum pay rate for a doctor is similar to the going pay rate for a new government motors or government bank executive. Exactly twice that of the entry level employee in the same organization - generally defined at a rate not to exceed twice the minimum wage. After all in a communist country like America, the proletariat must all be within spheres of each other to help maintain their compliance.

Good luck comrades!!

Are You A Part Of The Problem, Or A Part Of The Solution

I have spent a considerable amount of time reading about 'The Great Upheaval' of the late 1700's - a book by Jay Winik that describes in story-like detail the events of the American Revolution, The French Revolution and the European and Russian responses to these radical times and places in history.

In the relative comfort of America since the second world war period, we have forgotten what it takes to truly make a sacrifice and/or take a personal risk for important ideals, ideas, and priorities, and we can barely grasp the concept of civil disobedience for principle.

This evening, I watched on Fox News as they listened to the horrified frustration of victims whose losses by the Bernie Madoff scandal cost them their life fortunes. They sound like their the only people who lost money. I listened to the victims making excuses as to how they should be made right by the courts, the government, or even other ripped off investors.

Hey folks suck it up like the rest of America has. As we have all lost money watching our home equity disappearing, and our stock and other investment values have evaporated. Like you're the only ones that got screwed?

Look folks - it's as simple as this. If you are funding government with paying your taxes, you're enabling these fools - like serving alcohol to an alcoholic. If you don't agree our government is representing you and taxing accordingly (and spending according to the taxes collected), it is time to take a stand, and refuse to participate. If you are paying your taxes, you're a part of the problem. You are certainly NOT a part of the solution!

If you stop participating as I have, you take the responsibility for your actions. In discussing my position with my sister, she shockingly asks, "But aren't you afraid of the IRS putting you in jail"?

Well, I do expect civil disobedience to be challenged, and I expect people to disagree with me, but frankly, I can prove in a court of law - or more importantly in the court of public opinion that the Government is not representing me, taxing me appropriately, or spending responsibly. This is the only contract I have with the government of America regarding taxation, and as such, they have broken the contract. I am therefore relieved of my responsibility to pay my taxes.

But far more importantly is the fact that if I did pay my taxes, I would simply be enabling the problem to grow further - the same things I accuse our legislators of failing to do - stand for the responsible position - regardless of the consequences, and how people think of me.

You see, the way I see it, when I lost over $ 2 Million of net worth over the last two years, I determined to look into why this happened. I have determined that the problem was that the federal governments of the last two decades - both Republicans and Democrats - tookunsound and highly irresponsible positions with regards to lending practices, and Wall Street securities oversight, leading to a complete collapse of what is rippling out to be a worldwide economic disaster.

The 535 people of congress - best described in style and character by the "TheGuyFromBoston" (beware of very rough language!) are the responsible parties in terms of my losses. And until I have recovered the losses they have cost me, they owe me. I don't owe them. But even if I did owe them, I would have a hard time enabling their actions by funding them when they no longer tax me with "taxation by representation".

These are the jerks that have the nerve to give your public money to banks by the trillions of dollars, then ignore Detroit until they presume their own management skill superior to the experienced leadership of Geoffrey Waggoner, and the rest of the GM Board (as well as Chrysler's) that were left to clean up a mess created by Con-gress (the opposite of Pro-gress) in the first place.

I for one disagree. Con-gress can't manage a post office, or their own public responsibility let alone banks, auto companies, or justice. Any that have followed my (radical) writings already know how I feel about the inability and incompetence of the publicly funded courts, and their deputies. Frankly, it looks at lot like the late 1700's again, and frankly the world - and America - are ripe for revolution again as we once again are forced to overthrow the monarchs.

So unless you are enjoying your 'bread and circuses', decide what it is that you truly believe and decide on the stand you are going to take to undermine this fool's paradise.

I for one will not fund this stupidity. So look for me, and those (few) who agree with me - in a jail or in a headline near you. And if you decide I am not completely crazy, drop me a note and tell me so.

In Lieu Of Law

I am a creationist by belief. I believe in God, and so it is that the entire matter of where we came from emanates only from my belief in God - the being so much greater than myself, that all other consideration about where He or we came from becomes irrelevant to a discussion.

The theory of evolution however interests me - not because of the excuse to try to explain away God, but for what is evident in how things do naturally evolve with time in so many aspects of the world. Trends in everything are the basis for assumptions about the future. If 1 and 2 and 3 have happened, we can naturally assume 4 will be next. This is probably one of the top few laws of nature, as the only thing that disturbs a natural trend is an interference.

Whether an interference is seen as natural or unnatural is both a matter of perception and cause. If man caused the interference it is definitely seen as unnatural, and if man did not cause it but sees the cause as unnatural, this perception may have validity as well.

In either case, the trends of man to abandon God as times are comfortable appear to be natural. The entire Old Testament is made up of the stories of man naturally abandoning God, and God either using nature or the supernatural to intervene in the lives of the people of Israel to bring them back to Him.

America is the Israel of my existence in this age - the place I observe the hand of God being lifted from a country and then intervening in relatively small ways through the lives of people and families. But the trend of the country's Christian spiritual state is depressing to people like me. And so it is that I - and so many others - pray that God will supernaturally intervene and turn the hearts of the people toward Him like He did for the nation of Israel so many times.

The financial meltdown of 2008 was personal for me, and a turning point in my commitment, and I hope is having a greater and similar effect on the rest of America, but it will not be a surprise to me that America needs many more convulsions to get its head out of the sand. Like Pharoah refusing to listen as God served up plagues upon Egypt in the time of Moses, the Kings of America are stubborn and ignorant, and full of their own pride. Until the first sons must die, many will never see enough interference to alter their trend away from God.

Likewise, the American Book of Law has allowed a serious trend to develop that should give every thinking American pause - the separation of the Courts from the law they are 'sworn' to uphold. "Above the law" is now the mindset of many Judges in America. A "Law Unto Myself" is the mindset of even more. They are no longer American judges - they are their own judges - operating 'in lieu of law'.

Traditionally, the book of law was perceived by judges as the ultimate interpretation of the constitution's mandates - a noble cause, building on a noble document, that was seen predominantly as successful, and therefore worthy of respect.

In reality, the law has always had it's flaws and weaknesses - its injustices, and inconsistencies. But judges by education and respect for the law were adherents of the law, honored the intent of the law, and served to help build the book of law by filling in the gaps between.

And then the world changed. Media developed from a local newspaper to a national movie screen and a home information center, and the truth of the laws weaknesses were revealed and focused on. The nobility of the law was forsaken, and the respect for the law abandoned.

And no longer was the role of protector of the law perceived by the public as a noble job. And the ones who had this special job lost respect for what it is they had chosen to do.

But how should one react when the foundation of your chosen and invested profession crumbles? To quit? No. To redefine the foundation? Perhaps. To make it better? Definitely.

And so it is that the role of the judge is being redefined away from the Book of Law into the role of a new Lawmaker 'in lieu of law'.

But shouldn't this be the role of the elected lawmakers? The politicians? Yes - according to the Book of Law - but it just won't work says the judge to himself. And so it is that they have usurped the role of congress, and began to ADD law. The net result however is confusion and chaos.

This is the wrong role of judges and courts. But who can challenge this breach? There are but two possibilities beyond the Supreme Court's reach.

The first is the combined power of the full congressional Legislative Branch, with the solid support of the Executive Branch - the President and his White House.

If this fails, the only other possibility is to appeal to the Highest Authority in the land, the mind of the sheeple - the Main Stream Media. Only these two possibilities could make an impact on reigning in the minds and actions of arrogant judges that are determined to go their own way.

But has our America really the will to resolve this problem? Hell no! Most of us America doesn't even realize there is a problem.

So with that I will return you to the game - "with players on first and third and two outs......"

Good luck neighbors!